Activist Collective Claims to Have Scraped Countless of Music Files from the Streaming Giant

A digital rights organization has stated to have scraped a vast number of songs from Spotify and is getting ready to publish them publicly.

Potential Impetus for AI Training

Industry experts noted the apparent leak could boost AI companies looking for data to train their models.

An entity known as Anna’s Archive reported it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from the platform and 256 million entries of metadata such as artist and album names. The company, which carries more than 100 million songs, stated that the breach did not represent its full catalog.

“We have located and deactivated the nefarious user accounts that engaged in unlawful scraping,” stated a company spokesperson.

The Stockholm-based service, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, further explained that an inquiry into unauthorized access found a external actor collected public metadata and used questionable tactics to bypass DRM protections.

Archive's Declared Goal and Concerns

Spotify does not believe the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for offering links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group claimed the audio files represented 99.6% of all music listened to by Spotify users and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a method of sharing large data files online.

“Naturally Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which frames its mission as “safeguarding humanity’s information and heritage”.

Model Development and Copyright Battleground

Ed Newton-Rex for defending artists’ copyright, remarked the breached music would probably be used for developing AI models.

“Educating models on illegally sourced material is sadly common in the AI industry, so this accessed music is highly likely to end up training AI models,” he said.

The group's website alludes to LibGen, a vast online archive of pirated books that has reportedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to train its AI models.

The co-founder of an artificial intelligence company posted on LinkedIn that individuals of the public could in theory “build their own personal free equivalent of the service”. The executive said it could also allow tech companies to “educate models on modern music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has become a key issue between creatives, authors and content creators on one side and AI companies on the other.

Government Considerations and Reactions

In the UK, artists and writers have protested against a government suggestion to let AI companies utilize copyright-protected work without permission unless the owner opts out. Almost every participant to a government call for evidence on the idea has supported artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for technology, research and technology told parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the matter, noting that ministers would “take the time to get this correct”. The administration has committed to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by March 2025.

Samuel Perez
Samuel Perez

A tech journalist with over a decade of experience covering consumer electronics and digital innovation, passionate about making technology accessible to everyone.